工业4.0改变了自动控制架构的选择标准:为何采用IPC进行自动控制优于PLC和PAC

现今更灵活、运转速度更快、更智能、相互通讯、实时处理/分析数据的机器创造了足以改变世界格局的经济和生产力机会。其中重要的是,透过结合人工智能的工业4.0的信息共享将只会提高对系统要求的处理速度。能提供功能最灵活、作业最精确和最高性能的设备自动化和机器控制系统公司,将为他们的客户创造最大的利益价值。

  • 描述机器控制运用PLC、PAC以及IPC之间的区别
  • 探索工业4.0如何改变对机器控制架构的需求
  • 解释和 PLC或PAC相较之下,为什么IPC能提供最佳的机器控制架构

​Please fill out the form below to access the White Paper.

  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
Ethernet-based fieldbus standards have changed the game for machine builders. But with so many protocols competing to be most valuable and viable, how should you decide which to use?

In this white paper, “5 Real-Time, Ethernet-Based Fieldbuses Compared,” we examine five different protocols that claim to offer the best price/performance open standard for real-time Ethernet fieldbuses. Topics covered include:

Criteria for evaluating Ethernet real-time protocols

5 standards compared: Ethernet/IP, Ethernet Powerlink, EtherCAT, PROFINET IRT, & SERCOS III

Evaluation of standards bodies, philosophies, and architectural underpinnings, response time, jitter, data rate, and more

Fieldbus scorecard: which standard wins in price/performance and market acceptance?

Understand your options when it comes to real-time, Ethernet-based fieldbuses. Read the white paper to see how the top five standards stack up.